<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
	xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Only 34 Percent of Americans View Twitter Favorably	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://searchwilderness.com/34-percent-americans-view-twitter-favorably/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://searchwilderness.com/34-percent-americans-view-twitter-favorably/</link>
	<description>Technical SEO is Wild</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 03 Jan 2018 21:05:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Paul Shapiro		</title>
		<link>https://searchwilderness.com/34-percent-americans-view-twitter-favorably/#comment-203</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Paul Shapiro]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jul 2013 02:51:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://searchwilderness.com/?p=196#comment-203</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://searchwilderness.com/34-percent-americans-view-twitter-favorably/#comment-202&quot;&gt;P ONeill&lt;/a&gt;.

You do seem to be correct. I would probably attribute that to a rounding error, but I&#039;d expect more from something published by the Washington Post. Very unfortunate. Beyond the statistical error, the point still stands.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://searchwilderness.com/34-percent-americans-view-twitter-favorably/#comment-202">P ONeill</a>.</p>
<p>You do seem to be correct. I would probably attribute that to a rounding error, but I&#8217;d expect more from something published by the Washington Post. Very unfortunate. Beyond the statistical error, the point still stands.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: P ONeill		</title>
		<link>https://searchwilderness.com/34-percent-americans-view-twitter-favorably/#comment-202</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[P ONeill]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Jul 2013 09:34:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://searchwilderness.com/?p=196#comment-202</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Pretty sure some of the stats in that chart add up to 101% ?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pretty sure some of the stats in that chart add up to 101% ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Paul Shapiro		</title>
		<link>https://searchwilderness.com/34-percent-americans-view-twitter-favorably/#comment-201</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Paul Shapiro]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Apr 2012 09:27:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://searchwilderness.com/?p=196#comment-201</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://searchwilderness.com/34-percent-americans-view-twitter-favorably/#comment-200&quot;&gt;Laura&lt;/a&gt;.

Laura, this is a very good point, but I would file this complaint under the Twitter does a bad job of explaining itself category. There are several recommendations I can make to correct your problem. 

The best solution is probably going to be to use lists. It is a built-in feature of Twitter. You can go an create a list of just your friends and exclude anyone who is too noisy of tweeter.

Another solution would be to enable &quot;mobile notifications&quot; for specific users you wish not to miss. It will send a notification via SMS when that person tweets.

A third solution would to use a third party tool I actually really like called Shuush (http://shuu.sh). It visually filters out noisy twitter users minimizing the size of there tweets and increasing the size of quieter users.

Please let me know if any of these solutions end up working out for you :)]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://searchwilderness.com/34-percent-americans-view-twitter-favorably/#comment-200">Laura</a>.</p>
<p>Laura, this is a very good point, but I would file this complaint under the Twitter does a bad job of explaining itself category. There are several recommendations I can make to correct your problem. </p>
<p>The best solution is probably going to be to use lists. It is a built-in feature of Twitter. You can go an create a list of just your friends and exclude anyone who is too noisy of tweeter.</p>
<p>Another solution would be to enable &#8220;mobile notifications&#8221; for specific users you wish not to miss. It will send a notification via SMS when that person tweets.</p>
<p>A third solution would to use a third party tool I actually really like called Shuush (<a href="http://shuu.sh" rel="nofollow ugc">http://shuu.sh</a>). It visually filters out noisy twitter users minimizing the size of there tweets and increasing the size of quieter users.</p>
<p>Please let me know if any of these solutions end up working out for you 🙂</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Laura		</title>
		<link>https://searchwilderness.com/34-percent-americans-view-twitter-favorably/#comment-200</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Laura]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Apr 2012 03:11:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://searchwilderness.com/?p=196#comment-200</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Your reasons are spot on, but I have another to add. I am among the percent that does not really like twitter. I understand its uses, but logistically, it doesn&#039;t work for me. So I did what I was supposed to do and followed all those organizations/people that I would love updates from...but then...they tweet too much! For example, a Boston news source will post 15+ tweets a day. By the time I get out of work at night, I am so far behind , so I scroll to read as much as I can, but if each organization posts 15 or so, I am never going to catch up. So I miss a few..why does it matter? Because I follow some people I care about. I find myself every day going to the 3-5 users accounts that I care about to read their tweets because I always miss them in the flood of 30 &quot;breaking news&quot; or &quot;cnn&quot; tweets a day. I have just stopped following people who tweet too much. It should be a snapshot of news from different sources, not a flood of information from one source that it clogs up my feed. 

How do other people solve this problem (other than getting twitter notifications from select few people...)]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your reasons are spot on, but I have another to add. I am among the percent that does not really like twitter. I understand its uses, but logistically, it doesn&#8217;t work for me. So I did what I was supposed to do and followed all those organizations/people that I would love updates from&#8230;but then&#8230;they tweet too much! For example, a Boston news source will post 15+ tweets a day. By the time I get out of work at night, I am so far behind , so I scroll to read as much as I can, but if each organization posts 15 or so, I am never going to catch up. So I miss a few..why does it matter? Because I follow some people I care about. I find myself every day going to the 3-5 users accounts that I care about to read their tweets because I always miss them in the flood of 30 &#8220;breaking news&#8221; or &#8220;cnn&#8221; tweets a day. I have just stopped following people who tweet too much. It should be a snapshot of news from different sources, not a flood of information from one source that it clogs up my feed. </p>
<p>How do other people solve this problem (other than getting twitter notifications from select few people&#8230;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: fighto		</title>
		<link>https://searchwilderness.com/34-percent-americans-view-twitter-favorably/#comment-199</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[fighto]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Apr 2012 18:58:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://searchwilderness.com/?p=196#comment-199</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Why Do Only 34 Percent of Americans View Twitter Favorably? http://t.co/NxLoksEd My interpretation #socialmedia #blogpost]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why Do Only 34 Percent of Americans View Twitter Favorably? <a href="http://t.co/NxLoksEd" rel="nofollow ugc">http://t.co/NxLoksEd</a> My interpretation #socialmedia #blogpost</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: laurcohen		</title>
		<link>https://searchwilderness.com/34-percent-americans-view-twitter-favorably/#comment-198</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[laurcohen]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Apr 2012 16:29:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://searchwilderness.com/?p=196#comment-198</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Why Do Only 34 Percent of Americans View Twitter Favorably? http://t.co/MS8Val8s #socialmedia #blogpost via @fighto]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why Do Only 34 Percent of Americans View Twitter Favorably? <a href="http://t.co/MS8Val8s" rel="nofollow ugc">http://t.co/MS8Val8s</a> #socialmedia #blogpost via @fighto</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!--
Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: https://www.boldgrid.com/w3-total-cache/?utm_source=w3tc&utm_medium=footer_comment&utm_campaign=free_plugin

Page Caching using Disk: Enhanced 

Served from: searchwilderness.com @ 2026-03-17 00:53:34 by W3 Total Cache
-->